Their racism label is a problem. If you listen to their interviews, they can do a surprisingly good job at justifying their views on race. Particularly, they point to all the various organisations set up to promote “minorities” and ask: why not one for indigenous white people?
[Maybe I have missed something though, I'm happy to be corrected. *scared of being called racist*]
So as far as I can see, this “racism” label seems to be mostly media frenzy, and a distraction from some of their other policies:
We support the re-introduction of corporal punishment for petty criminals and vandals, and the restoration of capital punishment for paedophiles, terrorists and murderers as an option for judges in cases where their guilt is proven beyond dispute, as by DNA evidence or being caught red-handed.
Corporal punishment? They want to return Britain to the middle ages?
And reintroduce the death penalty? A person who in cold blood, can sentence another to death, can have no ability of empathy. To sentence a person to death is the ultimate absence of compassion.
If you cannot consider another person’s feelings or viewpoint, you should not be in government.
Not to mention the many other reasons against the death penalty.
But really, for all those reasons listed on that link by amnesty, for me it boils down to:
Someone who supports the death penalty can kill in cold blood.
And is not just able to club someone over the head who did not expect it, but would sentence someone to wait on death row for months or years, to contemplate their upcoming death. Then to chain someone down, with no hope of escape or redemption, while a lethal injection or electrocution or some such is administered. If it was carried out by a crazed psycho in a horror movie it would be considered sick and twisted. Torture.
So do death penalty supporters simply lack empathy, the ability to imagine themselves in such a situation? Or are they able to empathise, yet support this torture anyway?